Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Interna...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -2 v. Klm Royal Dutch Airlines Lb Through

High Court 02 Nov 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -2 v. Klm Royal Dutch Airlines Lb Through
Date of order
02 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -2 v. Klm Royal Dutch Airlines Lb Through, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1231/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -2 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES LB Through ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R% 02.11.2018 C.M. No.46152/2018 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. ITA 1231/2018 This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the case of K.L.M. Royal Dutch Airlines relates to assessment year 2010-11. The issue/question raised, which relates to taxation of technical handling services, is covered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee vide decision of this Court in DIT Vs. K.L.M. Royal Dutch Airlines, (2017) 392 ITR 218. In view of the aforesaid position, no substantial question of law arises for consideration. The appeal is dismissed. SANJIV KHANNA, J. NOVEMBER 02, 2018 NA ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan