In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -International Taxation-2 v. Kss Engineering Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are consequently dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~44 & 45
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 249/2018 & CM APPL. 7367/2018
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-2 ..... Appellant
versus
KSS ENGINEERING LTD.
..... Respondent
+ ITA 250/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-2
versus
..... Appellant
KSS ENGINEERING LTD.
..... Respondent
Present: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. None for respondent.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 26.02.2018
The only issue urged by the Revenue in its appeals challenging the order of the ITAT is the assessee’s liability to pay interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). The ITAT followed the decision of this Court in Directorate of Income Tax v. G.E. Packaged Power Inc. 373 ITR 65 (Del.). The facts of this case clearly show that the question of ITA Nos.249/2018 & 250/2018 Page 1 of 2
law with respect to Section 234B of the Act is covered by G.E. Package Power Inc. (supra). Therefore, no question of law arises. The appeals are consequently dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
FEBRUARY 26, 2018 kks
A. K. CHAWLA, J
ITA Nos.249/2018 & 250/2018
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.