The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd
High Court
17 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd
Date of order
17 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: These appeals are dismissed as untenable along with pending applications.” For the same reasons the present appeal is rejected along with pending applications.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~33
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 461/2018 & CM APPLN. 14793-14794/2018
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3, ..... Appellant
..... Appellant Through Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
SHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD.
..... Respondent Through Mr.Deepak Chopra and Mr.Amit Shrivastava, Advocates.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 17.04.2018
The Revenue’s appeals questions the decision of the ITAT with respect to collection of interest on non-deposit of advance tax, in regard to the amount received by non-resident/assessee. Identical appeals for another assessment year (ITA 409-410/2018, The commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation-3 vs. Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd.) were rejected by this Court on 09.04.2018. The Court had then observed as follows:
“The Tribunal (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) had followed the decisions of this Court in the case of „Director of Income Tax vs. Jacabs Civil Incorporated‟ ,(2001) 330 ITR 578, „Director of Income Tax, International Taxation vs. GE Packaged Power Inc. and ors.‟, (2015) 373 ITR 65 and „Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-2 vs. ZTE Corporation‟ ,
(2017) 392 ITR 80. Since the Tribunal followed the rulings of this Court no question of law arises. These appeals are dismissed as untenable along with pending applications.”
For the same reasons the present appeal is rejected along with pending applications.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
APRIL 17, 2018 ndn
A. K. CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue