In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Starwood Hotel & Resorts Worldwide Inc, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question urged for consideration is whether the centralized services rendered by the Assessee would amount to technical services in terms of –Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as well as under Article 12 of India US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 713/2019
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 ..... Appellant
..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ajit Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms.Adiba Mujahid, Advocate.
versus
STARWOOD HOTEL & RESORTS WORLDWIDE INC.
..... Respondent Through: Mr.Shailesh Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R02.08.2019
%
1. The Revenue is in appeal against an order dated 18[th] December 2018 passed by the ITAT in ITA 203/Del/2016 for the Assessment Year („AY‟) 2011-12.
2. The question urged for consideration is whether the centralized services rendered by the Assessee would amount to technical services in terms of –Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as well as under Article 12 of India US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
3. The Tribunal in the impugned order relied upon a decision of this Court inDirector of Income Tax v. Sheraton International Inc (2009) 178 taxman 84 (Del) which answers the question in favour of Assessee and against the Revenue.
4. Consequently, no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
AUGUST 02, 2019 tr
TALWANT SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.