Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Internat...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax -International Taxation-3 v. Sumitomo Corporation

High Court 16 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -International Taxation-3 v. Sumitomo Corporation
Date of order
16 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -International Taxation-3 v. Sumitomo Corporation, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 185/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus SUMITOMO CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 16.02.2018 The only question urged by the Revenue in this appeal is with respect to the correctness of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) decision on tax deduction at source and the interest leviable thereon under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT had relied upon the Uttaranchal High Court’s decision in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. vs. Sedco Forex International Drilling Co. Ltd., (2004) 186 CTR (Uttaranchal)144. This issue is also covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Director of Income Tax International Taxation vs. GE Packaged Power Inc, (2015) 373 ITR 65. Consequently, no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J FEBRUARY 16, 2018 nn A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan