Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Internat...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-(International Txation)-2 v. Corning Sas- India

High Court 09 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-(International Txation)-2 v. Corning Sas- India
Date of order
09 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-(International Txation)-2 v. Corning Sas- India, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed on account of low tax effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1076/2017 and CM APPL.40626/2024 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(INTERNATIONAL TXATION)-2 .....Appellant .....Appellant versus CORNING SAS- INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr.Aniket D.Agrwal and Mr.Abhisek Singhvi, Advocates % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAO R D E R09.10.2024 1.The Revenue has filed the present appeal impugning the order dated 29.05.2017 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.816/Del./2016 for the assessment year 2011-12. 2.At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue states that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below the threshold limit of ₹2,00,00,000/- as stipulated in the Circular dated 17.09.2024. 3.Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed on account of low tax effect. 4.Pending application also stands disposed of. VIBHU BAKHRU, J OCTOBER 09, 2024 SV SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan