The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Internationaltaxation -1 v. Bently Nevada Llc
High Court
26 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Internationaltaxation -1 v. Bently Nevada Llc
Date of order
26 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Internationaltaxation -1 v. Bently Nevada Llc, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~30
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ITA 1171/2018 & CM APP No. 44801/2018
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONALTAXATION -1..... Appellant
Through:Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Adv.
versus
BENTLY NEVADA LLC
..... Respondent
Through:Mr.Sachit Jolly, Adv.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIO R D E R%26.10.2018
CM APP No.44800/2018
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
ITA 1171/2018
Counsel for the parties state that the present appeal may be disposedof in terms of the order dated 01.06.2018 passed in ITA No. 661/2018, ThePr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 (International Taxation) vs. GeneralElectric Power Systems INC. It is stated that this would be in consonancewith Sections 158A and 158AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, though theseprovisions are not strictly applicable.
2. The question raised by the Revenue in these appeals relates to levy ofinterest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which issue iscovered against them vide the judgment of this Court in ‘Director of Income
Tax (International Taxation) vs. GE Packaged Power Inc.’, (2015) 373ITR 65 (Delhi).
3. The appeal against the said decision is pending before the Supreme Courtas special leave to appeal has been granted.
4. Counsel for the parties state that the ruling by the Supreme Court wouldequally apply to the present appeal. Recording the above, this appeal isdisposed of.
5. In case of any difficulty, it will be open to the parties to file an applicationin this appeal after the decision of the Supreme Court.
6. The appeal for the purpose of registry would be treated as disposed of.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
OCTOBER 26, 2018neelam
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.