Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ipune v....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ipune v. Late Smt. Shantabai B. Gandhil/H Shri Rajesh B. Gandhi

High Court 29 Apr 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ipune v. Late Smt. Shantabai B. Gandhil/H Shri Rajesh B. Gandhi
Date of order
29 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ipune v. Late Smt. Shantabai B. Gandhil/H Shri Rajesh B. Gandhi, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.In the light of that, present Income Tax Appeal is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA-103.14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax-IPune ...APPELLANT versus Late Smt. Shantabai B. GandhiL/H Shri Rajesh B. Gandhi ...RESPONDENT ..... Mr. A.D. Soman, Advocate holding for Mr. D.V. Soman, Advocate for appellantMr. B.S. Chondhekar, Advocate for respondent ..... CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. Order :- DATED : 29[th] APRIL, 2016. 1. We have perused the circular bearing No. 21 of 2015. On perusal of circular, it appears that a decision has been taken by the Income Tax Department that whenever, the tax liability is below Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs), the appeal pending before the High Court would be withdrawn. 2.In the present appeal, tax liability is to the tune of Rs.11, 85, 926/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs Eighty Five Thousands and Nine Hundred Twenty Six only). 3.In the light of that, present Income Tax Appeal is disposed of. No costs. Sd/-Sd/- [ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] MTK [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan