The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.vishnulaxmi Textiles Industries Pvt.ltd., Mumbai
High Court
08 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.vishnulaxmi Textiles Industries Pvt.ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
08 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.vishnulaxmi Textiles Industries Pvt.ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are dismissed accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3608 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusM/s.Omega Texrising (I) Limited, Mumbai..Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3888 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai..Appellant.
VersusM/s.Kandoi Polytex P. Limited..Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3889 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, Mumbai ..Appellant.VersusM/s.Ricolene Syntex Private Limited, Mumbai..Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3894 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, MumbaiVersus
..Appellant.
M/s.Wellknown Polyester Industries Limited, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. Mr.S.G. Dalal for the respondent in ITXA (L) 3888/2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3933 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Vishnulaxmi Textiles Industries Pvt.Ltd., Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.S.G. Dalal for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 8[th] JULY, 2009
P.C. :
1.The question as framed in these appeals is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Emptee Poly-Yarn P. Limited reported in [2008] 305 ITR 309(Bom).
2.In the light of that, there is no merit in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed accordingly with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue