The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur v. M/S Shivam Foods, Bahaddura, Umrer Road, Nagpur
High Court
27 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur v. M/S Shivam Foods, Bahaddura, Umrer Road, Nagpur
Date of order
27 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur v. M/S Shivam Foods, Bahaddura, Umrer Road, Nagpur, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (itl) No. 07 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Nagpur
v.
M/s Shivam Foods, Bahaddura, Umrer Road, Nagpur
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram Courts’s or Judge’s ordersappearances, Court’s orders or directionsand Registrar’s orders.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram : B.P .Dharmadhikari and V.M.Deshpande,JJ.
Date : 27th JANUARY, 2016
Heard Advocate Mohta for the appellant and Advocate Thakkar for the respondent/assessee.
Assessment Year involved in the present appeal is 2002-2003 and tax effect is Rs.16,49,396/-. Hence, we find that it is covered by Circular No.21/15 dated 10.12.2015 issued by CBDT. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Registry to refund proportionate court-fee to
the appellant.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.