The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv, Pune v. M/S.shriniwas Chilka Mill, Solapur
High Court
12 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv, Pune v. M/S.shriniwas Chilka Mill, Solapur
Date of order
12 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv, Pune v. M/S.shriniwas Chilka Mill, Solapur, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1318 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax - IV, PuneVersusM/s.Shriniwas Chilka Mill, Solapur
..Appellant...Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1319 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1321 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, PuneVersusShri Sidram Narsayya Chilka
..Appellant..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 12TH AUGUST 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Both the authorities below i.e. CIT (A) as well as the tribunal have held that the notice for assessment u/s 158 BC is ab-initio, void, as the notice issued was not proper. The finding of fact recorded by the tribunal in para 5 of the impugned order are based on appreciation of notice. No substantial question of law arises out of the order of the tribunal. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.