In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Pune v. Solapur District Co-Operative Milk Producers And Process Union Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: (2) Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari DudhUtpadak Sanghreported in (2009) 315 ITR 304 (Bom) 3For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
lgc
1 ITXA No.1065 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1065 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, PuneversusSolapur District Co-operative Milk Producersand Process Union Ltd.
: Appellant.
: Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.Mr. S N Inamdar for the Respondent.
CORAM :- J.P.DEVADHAR &
R.M.SAVANT,JJ.
DATE :- 07[th] December 2010
P.C.
Heard
Perused Appeal.
2The learned counsel for the Revenue states that the questions raised in this Appeal are covered against the Revenue in the Assessee’s own case i.e in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v/s. (1) Solapur Dist. Co-op. Milk
Producers and Process Union Ltd. (2) Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari DudhUtpadak Sanghreported in (2009) 315 ITR 304 (Bom)
3For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(R.M.SAVANT,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue