In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv Pune v. Tata Honeywell . Ltd.)........ Respondant, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Today also nobody appars on behalf of the appellant.Hence we are left with no option but to dismiss the appeal.Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 399 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV Pune ).......Appellants
versus
Tata Honeywell . Ltd.)........ Respondant.
None for the Appellant.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., &
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED: 04TH AUGUST 2008.
P.C.:
1.Nobody was present on behalf of the appellant on 28[th]July 2008. Today also nobody appars on behalf of the appellant.Hence we are left with no option but to dismiss the appeal.Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue