Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iv, Pun...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iv, Pune v. The Vishveshwar Sahakari Bank Limited

High Court 29 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iv, Pune v. The Vishveshwar Sahakari Bank Limited
Date of order
29 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iv, Pune v. The Vishveshwar Sahakari Bank Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1032 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Pune..Appellant. Versus The Vishveshwar Sahakari Bank Limited..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 29TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. The Solapur Nagari AudyogicSahakari Bank Limited in Income Tax Appeal No.46 of 2008 decided on 16thJune 2009. 2.In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan