The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv, Pune v. W.b. Engineers International Private Limited
High Court
25 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv, Pune v. W.b. Engineers International Private Limited
Date of order
25 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv, Pune v. W.b. Engineers International Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3314 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - IV, Pune..Appellant.
Versus
W.B. Engineers International Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 25[th] July, 2011.
1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the assessing officer on account of 10% of the sale consideration which was not paid in the assessment year in question, but, kept pending for the purpose of inspection and certification is the question raised in this appeal.
2.Perusal of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal shows that the Tribunal has relied upon a coordinate bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of DCIT V/s. Spirax Martial Limited reported in 110 ITR 229 (Pune) and the decision in the case of DCIT V/s. Deccan Mechanical & Chemical Industrial (P) Limited reported in (2006) 102 ITD 171 (Pune),
wherein, it is held that the payment of retention money was dependent upon the condition of satisfactory performance of the equipments during the warranty period and in such a case it cannot be said that any debt has accrued to the assessee. In such a case, the decision of the Tribunal in holding that the impugned amount did not accrue as income to the assessee in the assessment year in question cannot be faulted.
3.In the result, we see no merit in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.