Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Guj...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Gujarat Phenolic Synthetics

High Court 09 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Gujarat Phenolic Synthetics
Date of order
09 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Gujarat Phenolic Synthetics, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1375 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV ... AppellantVs.Gujarat Phenolic Synthetics... Respondents(P) Ltd. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondents. 1)Heard learned counsel for the Appellantand the respondents. 2)Perused the order of Tribunal.InParagraph no. 5, the Tribunal has recorded thefinding that the unsecured loans were admittedlyreceived from the directors and the only reasonfor treating these loans as unexplained cashcredits is that the assessee was not able tofurnish the income tax assessment particulars ofthe relevant persons before the assessing officer.However, on the basis of the other particulars furnished by the assessee the Tribunal held thatthe C.I.T.(A) ought to have deleted the entireadditions. 3)Thus the finding recorded by the Tribunalthat the loans received have been properlyexplained is a finding of fact. We do not findsubstantial questions of law arising from theorder of the Tribunal. Hence, appeal standsdismissed. ( DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan