The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ivcentral Circle, Chennai 600 034 v. M/S.handloom Heritage Limited
High Court
01 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ivcentral Circle, Chennai 600 034 v. M/S.handloom Heritage Limited
Date of order
01 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ivcentral Circle, Chennai 600 034 v. M/S.handloom Heritage Limited, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: For Appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.K.Ravi J U D G M E N T (Delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chen...
Decision: Recording the said submission, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed for low tax effect, keeping open the substantial question of law for adjudication at appropriate stage.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.10.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Tax Case Appeal No.394 of 2015and M.P.No.1 of 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax IVCentral Circle, Chennai 600 034....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Handloom Heritage Limited No.37, Rajamannar StreetT.Nagar, Chennai-17.
...Respondent
-----
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 18.05.2011 made in ITA No.1802/Mds/2010.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.K.Ravi
J U D G M E N T
(Delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue calling in question
the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B'
Bench, Chennai and the appeal was admitted on the following substantial
question of law:
"Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in quashing the revision orders made under Section 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax as infructuous?"
2. It is brought to our notice by the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant Revenue that in the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue can be disposed of, keeping the substantial question of law raised in this appeal open for adjudication at a later point of time.
3. Recording the said submission, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed for low tax effect, keeping open the substantial question of law for adjudication at appropriate stage. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
NCS : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoKST
(R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 01.10.2024
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal'B' Bench, Chennai.
T.C.A.No.394 of 2015
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN, J.
KST
T.C.A.No.394 of 2015
01.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.