The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar-Ii, Jalandhar v. Kedar Nath Singhania

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 332 of 2007 Decided on : 23.01.2017 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar-II, Jalandhar Versus . . . Appellant Kedar Nath Singhania . . . Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate for the appellant-revenue. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocatefor the respondent-assessee.**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue has produced an affidavit of Sh. Ajay Pal Singh, Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Jalandhar, in Court today, which is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. In Para 4 of the aforesaid affidavit, it has been stated that after re-calculating quantum of tax effect, it has been found that the tax effect, in terms of C.B.D.T. Circular No.21/2015, involved in the instant case is `11,98,346/-. 2.It was submitted that since the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than ` 20 lacs, the monetary limit prescribed by the C.B.D.T, New Delhi, vide circular No. 21/2015, dated 10.12.2015, therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein. 3.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE January 23, 2017J.Ram (RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:Whether Reportable: Yes/NoYes/No