The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar v. M/S Kasinka Trading, Jalandhar
High Court
05 Jul 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar v. M/S Kasinka Trading, Jalandhar
Date of order
05 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
1987-88
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar v. M/S Kasinka Trading, Jalandhar, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The reference is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
I.T.R. No.27 of 1997 Date of decision: 5.7.2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar.
Vs.
M/s Kasinka Trading, Jalandhar.
-----Applicant.
-----Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present:-Mr. Vivek Sethi, Sr. Standing Counselfor the applicant. ---for the applicant. ---
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
Following question of law has been referred foropinion of this Court, arising out of order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal dated 13.2.1996 in I.T.A. Nos.931 to 938
(ASR)/1990 for the assessment year 1987-88:-
“Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the ITAT is right in law in directing the
A.O. to delete the charging of interest u/s 201(1A) ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961?”
Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that thematter is covered by earlier order of this Court dated 10.7.2007 in
I.T.R. No.24 of 1996 The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Jalandhar v. Sh. Yash Paul Singh Bhalla Vimpi Restaurant..
In view of above, the question referred is answeredagainst the revenue and in favour of the assessee.
The reference is disposed of.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
July 05, 2010ashwani
( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.