Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jalandha...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jalandhar v. M/S Shalimar Films Pvt. Ltd., Jalandhar

High Court 17 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jalandhar v. M/S Shalimar Films Pvt. Ltd., Jalandhar
Date of order
17 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jalandhar v. M/S Shalimar Films Pvt. Ltd., Jalandhar, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: ITAT was right in law in upholding theorder of the CII(A) deleting addition of Rs.2,45,3801/made on account of accrued hire receipts in view of theSupreme Court decision reported at 91-CTR-108?2 Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Ld.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITAa112;ZOOL Date of Decision: 17.12.2014 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar VERSUS .-. Appellant M/s Shalimar Films Pvt. Ltd., Jalandhar .. Respondent CORAMHON2BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJTVE BHALLAHON2BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. WALIA PresentMr.Vivek Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant. KK OK K RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL) The revenue challenges order dated 21.07.2000, passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar, onthe following substantial questions of law: - “11Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Ld. ITAT was right in law in upholding theorder of the CII(A) deleting addition of Rs.2,45,3801/made on account of accrued hire receipts in view of theSupreme Court decision reported at 91-CTR-108?2 Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Ld. ITAT was justified in law in confirmingthe order of the CII(A) deleting the addition ofRs.85,974/- on account of unspent amount of publicityexpenses sanctioned by the producers?” We have heard counsel for the revenue, perused the impugned order and as the questions of law have already beenanswered against the revenue inTTC311992(The Commissioner ofIncometax, Jalandhar Vs. M/s Ashirwad Pictures, Jalandhara answer the questions of law against the revenue and dismiss theappeal, | RAJIVE BHALLA |JUDGE 17.1227014 |Shamsher S.Sabharwal 1 B.S. WALIA |JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan