Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedp...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur At Singhbhum East v. Sri Mangilal Chawla

High Court 26 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jhar_pg

Parties

Date of order

26 Jul 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur At Singhbhum East v. Sri Mangilal Chawla, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

---- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur at Singhbhum East ...… Petitioner. Versus Sri Mangilal Chawla --- ... ... Respondent. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----- For the Petitioner : M/s. Deepak Roshan, Advocate.For the Respondents : ----- ----- Order No. 04 Dated : 26th July 2013 Delay in filing this restoration petition is condoned in view of the fact that the Tax Appeal no.11/2007 was dismissed without notice to the parties and there is no need to issue notice to the respondents on the application for condonation of delay. In view the reasons given in the order dated 19th September, 2012 passed in C.M.P.NO.452/2011(The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Patna Vrs. Jai Prakash Singhania) and in view of the similar facts involved in the dismissal of T.A.NO.11/2007, this C.M.P is allowed and T.A.NO.11/2007 is restored to its original number. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) Biswas/SII ( Jaya Roy, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.