The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur … v. M/S. Trf Ltd., Jamshedpur ... …
High Court
27 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur … v. M/S. Trf Ltd., Jamshedpur ... …
Date of order
27 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur … v. M/S. Trf Ltd., Jamshedpur ... …, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3)Having heard counsels for both sides and looking to the Circular dated 10th December, 2015 and also looking to the facts that monetarylimit involved in the present case is less than Rs.20 lakhs and that thefacts of this case do not fall within the purview of the exceptions pointedout at paragraph...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Tax Appeal No.13 of 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur …Appellant VersusM/s. TRF Ltd., Jamshedpur...…......Respondent
------
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
-----
For the Appellant:M/s. Deepak RoshanFor the Respondent:
M/s. Darshana Poddar Mishra
------
20/Dated: 27th January, 2016
Per D.N. Patel, J.
1) Counsels appearing for the parties submitted that the latest circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, i.e. CBDT Circular 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015, gives revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals and the High Courts and for filing S.L.P. before Hon'ble the Supreme Court.
2)As per the aforesaid circular, monetary limit with respect to High Courts has been enhanced to Rs.20 Lakhs. This circular provides for some exceptions enumerated in Paragraph No.10 thereof and looking to Paragraph No.10 thereof, it appears that aforesaid instructions contained in the Circular is to be applied retrospectively to the pending appeals before the High Courts. Photocopy of the aforesaid circular is taken on record.
3)Having heard counsels for both sides and looking to the Circular dated 10th December, 2015 and also looking to the facts that monetarylimit involved in the present case is less than Rs.20 lakhs and that thefacts of this case do not fall within the purview of the exceptions pointedout at paragraph no.8of the aforesaid circular, this appeal is dismissed.
4)Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(D. N. Patel, J)
(Amitav K. Gupta, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.