The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur … v. Shri Gona Durga Sai
High Court
13 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur … v. Shri Gona Durga Sai
Date of order
13 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur … v. Shri Gona Durga Sai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3)Having heard counsels for both sides and looking to the Circular dated 10th December, 2015 and also looking to the facts that monetarylimit involved in the present case is less than Rs.20 lakhsand that thefacts of this case do not fall within the purview of the exceptions pointedout at paragraph n...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHITax Appeal No.31 of 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur …
Appellant
Versus
Shri Gona Durga Sai, Prop. M/s Sai Enterprises, NH 33, Kumrum, P.O. & P.S.- Mango, Jamshedpur
…
…
...…......Respondent
------
CORAM:HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
-----
For the Appellant:M/s. Deepak Roshan, Advocate For the Respondent:M/s. Sachin Kumar, Advocate
------
11/Dated: 13th April, 2018
(Oral order)Per D.N. Patel, ACJ.
1)Counsels appearing for the parties submitted that the latest circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, i.e. CBDT Circular 21/2015
dated 10th December, 2015, gives revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals and the High Courts and for filing S.L.P. before Hon'ble the Supreme Court.
2)As per the aforesaid circular, monetary limit with respect to High Courts has been enhanced to Rs.20 Lakhs. This circular provides for some exceptions enumerated in Paragraph No.10 thereof and looking to Paragraph No.10 thereof, it appears that aforesaid instructions contained in the Circular is to be applied retrospectively to the pending appeals before the High Courts. Photocopy of the aforesaid circular is taken on record.
3)Having heard counsels for both sides and looking to the Circular dated 10th December, 2015 and also looking to the facts that monetarylimit involved in the present case is less than Rs.20 lakhsand that thefacts of this case do not fall within the purview of the exceptions pointedout at paragraph no.8of the aforesaid circular, this appeal is dismissed.
4)Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(D. N. Patel, ACJ)
(Amitav K. Gupta, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.