The Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Ltu Unit v. M/S.abb Ltd
High Court
12 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Ltu Unit v. M/S.abb Ltd
Date of order
12 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Ltu Unit v. M/S.abb Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1493 OF 2011
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1027 OF 2010
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1027 OF 2010
…
The Commissioner of Income Tax-(LTU Unit) ..Applicant/Appellantvs.M/s.ABB Ltd ..Respondent
…
Mr.Sureshkumar for the Applicant/Appellant.Ms.Vasanti Patel for the Respondent.
…
P.C.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 12 DECEMBER 2014
Heard both sides. For the reasons set out in the
affidavit in support, the delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.By consent of both sides, the Appeal itself is taken up for admission.
3.Having perused the order under challenge and the questions of law which have been formulated in the Paper Book, we
nma-1493-11.doc
are of the view that each one of them stands answered by a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v/s. Excel Industries Ltd & Mafatlal Industries, reported in (2013) 358 ITR 295.
4.Both Counsel concede accordingly. In such circumstances, the Appeal is devoid of merits. It is dismissed. No costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.