The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu v. M/S. S.i.group India Ltd
High Court
16 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu v. M/S. S.i.group India Ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu v. M/S. S.i.group India Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 149 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-LTU..Appellantversus
M/s. S.I.Group India Ltd.
..Respondent
--------
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate i/b Mrs. Padma Diwakar for the Appellant.
Mr. Sanjiv Shah for the Respondent.
.............
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE
: 16[th] October, 2012
P.C. :
1Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal.
2
The penalty in the present case arises on
account of disallowing the revenue expenditure
claimed by the assessee. The finding of facts
recorded by the ITAT is that the assessee has incurred the expenditure, however has wrongly claimed the expenditure as revenue expenditure. In the absence of any finding that there is any concealment of particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, the decision
of ITAT in deleting the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be faulted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.