The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu v. M/S.maneesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd
High Court
14 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu v. M/S.maneesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
14 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu v. M/S.maneesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2719 OF 2010
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1381 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-LTU )..AppellantsVs.M/s.Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.,)..Respondents----
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellants.
Mr. R.G.Seth i/by R.G.Seth & Co. for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 14/2/2011.
PC
1By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause-(a). Notice of Motion disposed off.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1381 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-LTU )..Appellants
Vs.M/s.Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.,)..Respondents----
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellants.
Mr. R.G.Seth i/by R.G.Seth & Co. for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR &
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 14/2/2011.
PC
1Counsel for the Revenue states that the questions raised in
this appeal are covered against the assessee in the assessee’s own
case in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1446 of 2005 which is dismissed by us today. For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue