The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai City 18, Mumbai v. Shri Ramchandra B. More
High Court
25 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai City 18, Mumbai v. Shri Ramchandra B. More
Date of order
25 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai City 18, Mumbai v. Shri Ramchandra B. More, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.506 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-taxMumbai City 18, Mumbai
vs.
Shri Ramchandra B. More
Appellant
Respondent
Mr. Vijay Kantharia i/b. Mr. H.D. Rathod for theappellant.
P.C.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 25th August 2004
Heard.2. The substantial question of law that has beenproposed in the appeal stands concluded by the DivisionBench judgment in the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co.Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, 249 ITR 265.3. The learned counsel for the revenue submits that thesaid judgment is under challenge before the SupremeCourt.
4. In so far as we are concerned, the controversy
stands concluded by the Division Bench of this Court.
5. No substantial question of law arises.
6. Appeal does not deserve to be entertained.
7. Dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue