The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City-18 v. Late Shri. Lalji C. Chheda, L.h. Shri. Shantilal L. Chheda
High Court
25 Jan 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City-18 v. Late Shri. Lalji C. Chheda, L.h. Shri. Shantilal L. Chheda
Date of order
25 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City-18 v. Late Shri. Lalji C. Chheda, L.h. Shri. Shantilal L. Chheda, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SSM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2427 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6745 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-18 .... AppellantVERSUS
Late Shri. Lalji C. Chheda,L.H. Shri. Shantilal L. Chheda.... Respondent
Mr. K. R. Chaudhari for the Appellant.Mrs. Renu Choudhary i/by A. R. Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM:J. P. DEVDHAR and
MRIDULA BHATKAR J.J.DATED:JANUARY 25, 2011.
P.C.:
By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J)
(J. P. DEVDHAR, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue