The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City 24, Mumbai v. Aminabai Yasin, Mumbai
High Court
15 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City 24, Mumbai v. Aminabai Yasin, Mumbai
Date of order
15 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City 24, Mumbai v. Aminabai Yasin, Mumbai, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.337 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income TaxMumbai city 24, Mumbai
vs.
Aminabai Yasin, Mumbai.
Mr.R.Asokan i/b. Mr.L.S.Shetty for the appellant.
Appellant
Respondent
P.C.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 15th October 2004
The controversy raised in this appeal is concludedby the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Cadell
Weaving Mill Co. Pvt.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income
Tax, 249 ITR 265.
2. The learned counsel for the revenue, however,submits that the appeal against the said order ispending before the Supreme Court. Even if that be so,
in so far as we are concerned, the controversy stands
concluded by the Division Bench judgment of this Court.
3. No substantial question of law arises.
4. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue