The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City I, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Conductors Ltd
High Court
16 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City I, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Conductors Ltd
Date of order
16 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City I, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Conductors Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.261 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income tax,Mumbai City I, Mumbai.
vs.
M/s. Hindustan Conductors Ltd.
Appellant
Respondent
Mr. K. R. Chaudhary i/b. Mr. H. D. Rathod for theappellant.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 16th August 2004P.C.The learned counsel for the revenue submits thatthe controversy raised in the appeal is concluded by thejudgment of the Supreme Court in the case ofCommissioner of Income-tax v. Indo Nippon Chemicals Co.Ltd., 261 ITR 275. The learned counsel submits that inview thereof, the revenue does not intend to press theappeal and he may be allowed to withdraw the appeal.2. Allowed to be withdrawn.3. Refund of court fee as per law.(R.M. LODHA,J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue