Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai C...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Ii v. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., Mumbai

High Court 29 May 1998 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Ii v. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
29 May 1998
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Ii v. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (1998) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.93 OF 1998 WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1101 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City II VersusTata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., Mumbai ..Applicant. ..Respondent. Mr.Vinod Gupta for the applicant.Mr.Ajit Shah for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 17 June, 2010. P.C. : 1.The application has been dismissed on 29 May 1998 for non removal of office objections. It appears that a Notice of Motion No.1101 of 1998 has been taken out for restoration of the application to file. The Notice of Motion is not available on record today. The registry is directed to trace the Notice of Motion. The attention of the Court has been drawn to the fact that the issue on merits has been covered in favour of the assessee by a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Income­tax V/s. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Limited.[1] In view of the fact that the issue on merits has now been decided by a Division Bench in favour of the assessee which is not disputed before this Court by the Revenue, we consider it appropriate to restore the Income­tax Application to file and upon restoration, the application has been called out for hearing by consent and is taken on board. The Notice of Motion is, accordingly, disposed of. 3.In view of the judgment of the Division Bench noted earlier, the Income­tax Application is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan