The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Ix, Mumbai. Appellant v. Lokhandwala Construction Inds. Ltd. Respondent
High Court
25 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Ix, Mumbai. Appellant v. Lokhandwala Construction Inds. Ltd. Respondent
Date of order
25 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Ix, Mumbai. Appellant v. Lokhandwala Construction Inds. Ltd. Respondent, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.531 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income-tax,Mumbai city IX, Mumbai.Appellant
vs.
Lokhandwala Construction Inds.Ltd.Respondent
Mr. R.V. Desai, senior counsel with Mr.Vijay Kanthariai/b. Mr.H.D. Rathod for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Shah for the respondent.
P.C.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 25th August 2004
Heard Mr.R.V.Desai, the learned senior counsel for
the revenue.
in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Lokhandwala
Construction Inds.Ltd., 260 ITR 579.
3. In view thereof, it cannot be said that any questionof law arises in this appeal.
4. Appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue