The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Ix, Mumbai v. M/S.sanjay Indl.engineers P. Ltd
High Court
28 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Ix, Mumbai v. M/S.sanjay Indl.engineers P. Ltd
Date of order
28 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Ix, Mumbai v. M/S.sanjay Indl.engineers P. Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.619 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai city IX, Mumbaivs.M/s.Sanjay Indl.Engineers P. Ltd.
Appellant
Respondent
Mr.R.Asokan i/b. Mr.S.S.Sarkar for the appellant.
P.C.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 28th October 2004
Heard.
2. The issue raised in the present appeal standsconcluded by the Division Bench judgment of this Courtin the case of Commissioner of Income-tax v. SudarshanChemicals Industries Ltd, 245 ITR 769. However, thelearned counsel for the revenue submits that the saidjudgment is under appeal in the Supreme Court. Even ifthat be so, in so far as we are concerned, the issue
stands concluded by the Division Bench judgment of this
Court.
3. No substantial question of law arises.
4. Dismissed in limine.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue