In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Vi v. M/S.essel Packaging Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.98 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City VI..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Essel Packaging Limited..Respondent.
Ms.Padma Divakar i/by Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for the appellant.Mr.Sanjeev M. Shah for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 28[th] March, 2011.
1.Counsel for the parties state that the questions of law raised in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of the Apex Court
in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Laxmi Machine Works reported in 290 ITR 667.
2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue