The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City Xiii v. Mrs.rehana M. Adenwala
High Court
21 Dec 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City Xiii v. Mrs.rehana M. Adenwala
Date of order
21 Dec 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City Xiii v. Mrs.rehana M. Adenwala, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.152 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income TaxMumbai city XIIIvs.
Mrs.Rehana M. Adenwala
Mr.R.Asokan i/b. Mr.S.S.Sarkar for the appellant.
Appellant
Respondent
P.C.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 21st December 2004
Heard.
2. The issue raised in the appeal is concluded by theDivision Bench judgement of this Court in the case of
Cadell Weaving Mill Co. Pvt.Ltd vs. Commissioner of
Income Tax, 249 ITR 265.
3. However, the learned counsel for the revenue submitsthat the said judgement is under challenge before theSupreme Court. Even if that be so, in so far as we are
concerned, the issue stands concluded by the Division
Bench judgement of this Court.
4. No substantial question of law arises.
5. Dismissed in limine.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue