Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai C...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City-Xiv, Mumbai v. Mr.anil Tibrewala

High Court 13 Dec 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City-Xiv, Mumbai v. Mr.anil Tibrewala
Date of order
13 Dec 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City-Xiv, Mumbai v. Mr.anil Tibrewala, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.122 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai city-XIV, Mumbai vs. Mr.Anil Tibrewala Mr. R.V.Desai, senior counsel i/b. Mr.H.D.Rathod forthe appellant. Mr.Sanjeev M. Shah for the respondent. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DATED: 13th December 2004 J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. P.C. Heard. 2. The impugned order does not suffer from any legal infirmity. No substantial question of law arises. 3. Dismissed in limine. (R.M. LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) Appellant Respondent
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan