Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai Ci...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City Xiv v. M/S.jamnadas M. Choksi Jewellers, Mumbai Respondent

High Court 21 Dec 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

21 Dec 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City Xiv v. M/S.jamnadas M. Choksi Jewellers, Mumbai Respondent, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.106 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income TaxMumbai city XIVvs.M/s.Jamnadas M. Choksi Jewellers, Mumbai Respondent Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Mr.R.Asokan i/b.Mr.H.D.Rathod for the appellant. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DATED: 21st December 2004 J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. P.C. Heard. 2. The findings recorded by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal are concluded on facts.Tribunal are concluded on facts. 3. No substantial question of law arises. 4. Dismissed in limine. (R.M. LODHA,J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) Appellant

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.