The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Xxi, Mumbai v. Appellant
High Court
23 Nov 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Xxi, Mumbai v. Appellant
Date of order
23 Nov 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Xxi, Mumbai v. Appellant, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-Tax,Mumbai city XXI, Mumbaivs.Smt.Sumatibai D. Samant
Appellant
Respondents
Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/b. Mr.S.S.Sarkar for the appellant.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 23rd November 2004
P.C.
Heard.
2. The issue raised in the appeal is concluded by theDivision Bench judgment of this Court in the case ofCadell Weaving Mill Co. Pvt.Ltd. vs. Commissioner ofIncome Tax, 249 ITR 265. However, the learned counselfor the revenue submits that the said judgment is inappeal before the Supreme Court. Even if that be so, in
so far as we are concerned, the issue stands concluded
by the Division Bench judgment of this Court.
3. No substantial question of law arises.
4. Dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue