In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Xxi, Mumbai v. Shri Harnish V. Shah, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 662 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai city XXI, Mumbai.vs.Shri Harnish V. Shah
AppellantRespondent
Mr.R.Asokan i/b. Mr.S.S.Sarkar for the appellant.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 29th November 2004
P.C.
Heard.
controversy stands concluded by the Division Bench
judgment of this Court.
3. No substantial question of law arises.
4. Dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.