The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Xxvi v. Shri W.w. Koresgren, Mumbai 18
High Court
12 Feb 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Xxvi v. Shri W.w. Koresgren, Mumbai 18
Date of order
12 Feb 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai City Xxvi v. Shri W.w. Koresgren, Mumbai 18, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.47 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City XXVI..Appellant.
VersusShri W.W. Koresgren, Mumbai 18..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Dinesh Vyas, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajit Shah i/by Mr.Srihari Iyer for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 5[th] July, 2011.
1.Not on board. Taken up by consent of both the parties.
2.Counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this appeal is covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Incometax V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Limited reported in (2000) 245 ITR 823 (Bom).
3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue