The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai Ciuty Xv, Mumbai v. Shri Raghuvir Prasad Kagzi (Huf), Mumbai
High Court
24 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai Ciuty Xv, Mumbai v. Shri Raghuvir Prasad Kagzi (Huf), Mumbai
Date of order
24 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai Ciuty Xv, Mumbai v. Shri Raghuvir Prasad Kagzi (Huf), Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Works(2005) 276 ITR 519, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.664 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai Ciuty XV, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Shri Raghuvir Prasad Kagzi (HUF), Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 24[th] AUGUST 2009
P.C. :
1.The tax effect involved in this appeal is Rs.80,967/-. Since the tax effect is less than Rs.4 lakhs, following the judgments of this Court in CIT V/s.Camco Colour Co. (2002) 254 I.T.R. 565and CIT V/s. Pithwa Engg. Works(2005) 276 ITR 519, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue