Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai-I...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai-Ii, Mumbai-20 v. Appellant

High Court 23 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

23 Sep 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai-Ii, Mumbai-20 v. Appellant, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: We accept the statement of the learned counsel and allow the appeal to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 149 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income-tax,Mumbai-II, Mumbai-20.vs. Appellant M/s.India Coffee & Tea DistributingCo. Ltd.Respondent Mr.R.Asokan i/b. Mr.K.B. Rao for the appellant. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 23rd September 2004 case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Indo NipponChemicals Co. Ltd., 261 ITR 275. 2. We accept the statement of the learned counsel and allow the appeal to be withdrawn. 3. Refund of court fee as per law. (R.M. LODHA, J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.