Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Late Shri Lalji C. Chheda, Mumbai

High Court 21 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Late Shri Lalji C. Chheda, Mumbai
Date of order
21 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Late Shri Lalji C. Chheda, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1360 OF 2011 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6746 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai...Appellant.Vs. Late Shri Lalji C. Chheda, Mumbai..Respondent. Mr. R.A.Lokhande for the Appellant. Ms. Renu Choudhary i/by Ajay R. Singh for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2011. P.C. By consent Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) ( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan