The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Mr.j.chassaing
High Court
12 Jan 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Mr.j.chassaing
Date of order
12 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Mr.j.chassaing, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.121 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.121 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Petitioner
V/s
Mr.J.Chassaing .. Respondent
Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.Kapoor for the Petitioner.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 12.01.2005.
DATE : 12.01.2005.
DATE : 12.01.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that
in the light of judgment of this Court in the case of
Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.J.K.Investors (Bom)
Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.J.K.Investors (Bom)P.Ltd. - 248 ITR 723, the issue involved in the present
P.Ltd. - 248 ITR 723,
case is covered as against the Revenue. In view
thereof, nothing further survives in this Application.
Application stands dismissed.
.....
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue