Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - Mumbai...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - Mumbai v. M/S B. M. Plast

High Court 10 Jan 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Jan 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - Mumbai v. M/S B. M. Plast, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 408 of 2011. The Commissioner of Income-tax - Mumbai ... Appellant. Versus M/s B. M. Plast .. .... Respondent. Mr D. K. Kamwal for the appellant.Aasifa Khan and Satish Mody for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 10 January,2012. P.C. :- Counsel for the revenue states that he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per rules is granted. (A.R.Joshi,J) (J.P.Devadhar,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.