Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S. Gaylord Investments & Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd

High Court 03 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

03 Dec 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S. Gaylord Investments & Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Motion is made absolute. Delay is condoned. Office to register the appeal. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J. ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2031 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai. ..Appellant.Vs.M/s. Gaylord Investments & Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.J. D. Mistry i/by Raj Darak for the Respondent. ..Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 3RD DECEMBER,2007. PC : 1. Liberty granted to amend the cause title. Amendmentto be carried out within 15 days from today. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J. )

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.