Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - Mumbai...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - Mumbai v. M/S Phoenix Mills Ltd

High Court 09 Dec 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - Mumbai v. M/S Phoenix Mills Ltd
Date of order
09 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - Mumbai v. M/S Phoenix Mills Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in confirming the order of the CITA in condoning the delay of 1358 days in filing the appeal before the CITA is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 5596 of 2010. The Commissioner of Income-tax - Mumbai ... Appellant. Versus M/s Phoenix Mills Ltd ... Respondent. Mr Arvind Pinto with Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Counsel with Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 9th December, 2011. P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in confirming the order of the CITA in condoning the delay of 1358 days in filing the appeal before the CITA is the question raised in this appeal. The Tribunal in its order has held that the sufficient cause is shown by the Assessee for condoning the delay. In our opinion, no case is made out for entertaining this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. (A.R.Joshi,J) (J.P.Devadhar,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan