The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.hasmukh & Co. (P.g.) 366
High Court
27 Apr 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.hasmukh & Co. (P.g.) 366
Date of order
27 Apr 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.hasmukh & Co. (P.g.) 366, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence the Appeal is dismissed. .....
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.260 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.260 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s
M/s.Hasmukh & Co. (P.G.) 366,
Kalbadevi Road, Mumbai 400 002. .. Respondent
Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.
Mr.A.R.Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused
the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai,
dated 18.9.2002, wherein the Tribunal has observed as
under:-
" The present assessment years 90-91 and 91-92, being
the subsequent years, we are of the opinion that no addition is required to be made on account of investment in unaccounted purchases, because the unaccounted income assessed in the assessment year 89-90 was available with
the assessee for such investment."
2. We find that there is no substantial question of law
involved in this Appeal. The issue involved is merely a
finding of fact. Hence the Appeal is dismissed.
.....
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.