The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.sanman Distributors Pvt.ltd.mumbai
High Court
05 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.sanman Distributors Pvt.ltd.mumbai
Date of order
05 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.sanman Distributors Pvt.ltd.mumbai, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.193 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.193 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.193 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Petitioner
V/s
M/s.Sanman Distributors Pvt.Ltd.Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for the
Petitioner.
Mr.P.J.Pardiwala i/by M/s.Ray’s Law Firm for the
Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN&
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the
additions in the hands of BDA Limited have been made on
substantive basis, and in view thereof, he seeks leave
to withdraw this application. Application is therefore
allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.