Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Neelkamal Exhibitors Pvt.ltd

High Court 23 Jan 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Neelkamal Exhibitors Pvt.ltd
Date of order
23 Jan 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Neelkamal Exhibitors Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: By this Application, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised by the Petitioner. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in cancelling the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax u/s.263 relying upon decis...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATINO NO.187 OF 2002 INCOME TAX APPLICATINO NO.187 OF 2002 INCOME TAX APPLICATINO NO.187 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Petitioner V/s Neelkamal Exhibitors Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.A.N.Kotangale for the Petitioner. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN& CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 23rd January, 2007. DATE : 23rd January, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. By this Application, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised by the Petitioner. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in cancelling the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax u/s.263 relying upon decision in the case of P.Muncherji when the said decision is not in operation due to stay of operation granted by the Supreme Court?" 2. There is no dispute that on the day when the Commissioner of Income Tax invoked the jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, there was already a decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.P.Muncherji & Company - 167 ITR 671 167 ITR 671. In view of the aforesaid judgment which was in favour of the assessee, the Commissioner of Income Tax could not have invoked the jurisdiction under Sectino 263 of the Income Tax Act since it was covered by the aforesaid judgment. 3. There is no substantial question of law involved in this matter. Hence, the Income Tax Application stands dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan